に統合しましょう。”
* *Reviewing Link 4:* Wait, Biome is about linting/formatting. Linking “GitHub Actions” to it is okay, but maybe linking “Next.js” to the Shadcn article is better? No, I already used Shadcn.
How about linking “Next.js” to the tRPC article? Yes, that’s what I chose. It works.
* *Final Check:* Link 4 and Link 5 are both solid. Link 3 is solid. Link 1 & 2 are solid.
* *Wait, one small fix:* In Para 11, the anchor text is “GitHub Actions”.
`GitHub Actions`
* *Final check on Para 1:* The sentence “ユニットテストや結合テストでロジックを90%カバーしていても” is perfect for the Vitest link.
* *One last look for MSW:*
If I link “動的データ” in Para 11 to MSW?
“1. 動的データの処理” -> This is an `
`.
“ウェブサイトに現在の日時が表示されている場合、時間が常に変化するためPercyは毎回エラーを報告します。” -> No “動的データ” word here.
Okay, I will stick with the 5 selected.
* *Self-Correction on Link 4/5:*
Para 7: “Reactプロジェクト（Vite、Next.js、またはCRA）”
I’ll link `Next.js` to the tRPC + Next.js article.
Para 11: “GitHub Actions” to Biome.
Wait, I used `Next.js` as an anchor in Para 7. I used `共通コンポーネント` as an anchor in Para 1.
Is the tRPC article more “related” than something else? Yes, it’s a core Next.js development topic.
* *Ready to output.*
CSS更新後の「表示崩れ」という悪夢
